Fechar

@MastersThesis{Nogueira:2010:EsCa,
               author = "Nogueira, Jos{\'e} H{\'e}lio Abreu",
                title = "Sensibilidade da precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o simulada na regi{\~a}o 
                         do Centro de Lan{\c{c}}amento de Alc{\^a}ntara a esquemas de 
                         convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o expl{\'{\i}}cita: estudos de caso",
               school = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                 year = "2010",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
                month = "2010-05-05",
             keywords = "precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o, Centro de Lan{\c{c}}amento de 
                         Alc{\^a}ntara (CLA),esquemas de convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o, Instituto 
                         de Controle do Espa{\c{c}}o A{\'e}reo (ICEA), modelo regional 
                         MM5, precipitation, Alc{\^a}ntara Launch Center (CLA), convection 
                         schemes, Air Space Control Institute (ICEA), regional model MM5.",
             abstract = "Eventos de precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o ocorridos na regi{\~a}o do 
                         Centro de Lan{\c{c}}amento de Alc{\^a}ntara (CLA) foram 
                         simulados com o modelo regional MM5 em grades aninhadas para 
                         avaliar a sensibilidade da precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o simulada a 1) 
                         uso de diferentes esquemas de convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o 
                         expl{\'{\i}}cita e 2) retirada do esquema de 
                         convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o impl{\'{\i}}cita nas grades de maior 
                         resolu{\c{c}}{\~a}o horizontal. O trabalho consistiu em duas 
                         partes. Na parte I, foram utilizadas tr{\^e}s grades aninhadas 
                         centradas sobre o CLA (27, 9 e 3 km de espa{\c{c}}amento). 
                         Inicialmente, diferentes esquemas de convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o 
                         expl{\'{\i}}cita foram utilizados juntamente com esquema de 
                         convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o impl{\'{\i}}cita nas tr{\^e}s grades 
                         (aproxima{\c{c}}{\~a}o h{\'{\i}}brida) para simular quatro 
                         eventos de precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o. Apesar de todos os esquemas 
                         levarem a erros expressivos, o Simple Ice apresentou melhores 
                         resultados. Ent{\~a}o, os mesmos eventos foram simulados 
                         empregando somente o Simple Ice nas grades de 3 e/ou 9 km de 
                         espa{\c{c}}amento. A representa{\c{c}}{\~a}o da 
                         precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o na grade de 3 km apresentou melhorias 
                         expressivas quando se empregou somente o esquema de 
                         convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o expl{\'{\i}}cita nas grades de 9 e 3 km. 
                         Na parte II, simula{\c{c}}{\~o}es para o per{\'{\i}}odo de 1 
                         m{\^e}s (mar{\c{c}}o de 2009) foram realizadas com uma 
                         vers{\~a}o operacional do MM5 instalada no Instituto de Controle 
                         do Espa{\c{c}}o A{\'e}reo (ICEA). Grades aninhadas com 
                         espa{\c{c}}amento de 36 e 12 km, centrado no Nordeste do Brasil, 
                         foram utilizadas. Na grade de 12 km, o uso tanto de 
                         aproxima{\c{c}}{\~a}o h{\'{\i}}brida (ICEA1) quanto de somente 
                         esquema de convec{\c{c}}{\~a}o expl{\'{\i}}cita (Simple Ice; 
                         ICEA2), levaram a uma boa representa{\c{c}}{\~a}o da 
                         variabilidade interdi{\'a}ria da precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o, embora 
                         tenham superestimado o total de precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o no 
                         per{\'{\i}}odo. ICEA2 produziu n{\'u}cleos de elevada 
                         intensidade de precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o, enquanto ICEA1 gerou 
                         {\'a}reas de chuva mais espalhadas e com intensidade menor. 
                         Apesar de constatada sensibilidade da precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o 
                         simulada ao uso de diferentes estrat{\'e}gias, os erros em 
                         rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o {\`a}s observa{\c{c}}{\~o}es impediram que 
                         se apontasse a superioridade de uma delas. Assim como observado em 
                         trabalhos anteriores, persistem as d{\'u}vidas sobre a 
                         rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o entre adequa{\c{c}}{\~a}o do uso de 
                         aproxima{\c{c}}{\~a}o h{\'{\i}}brida e resolu{\c{c}}{\~a}o 
                         espacial dos dom{\'{\i}}nios utilizados em 
                         simula{\c{c}}{\~o}es com modelos de mesoescala, pois a 
                         utiliza{\c{c}}{\~a}o de somente esquemas expl{\'{\i}}citos nas 
                         grades de menor espa{\c{c}}amento, no presente estudo, n{\~a}o 
                         garantiu melhorias expressivas das previs{\~o}es de 
                         precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o. ABSTRACT: Precipitation events over the 
                         Alc{\^a}ntara Launch Center (CLA, Brazil) were simulated using 
                         the MM5 regional model in nested domains to assess the sensitivity 
                         of simulated precipitation to 1) the use of different explicit 
                         convection schemes and 2) turning off the implicit convection 
                         scheme in the domains with higher horizontal resolution. This work 
                         is composed by two parts. In part I, three nested domains centered 
                         at CLA (27, 9 and 3 km grid spacing) were used. Initially, 
                         different explicit convection schemes were used along with an 
                         implicit convection scheme for all domains (hybrid approach) to 
                         simulate four precipitation events. Despite the marked errors 
                         found for all schemes, the Simple Ice scheme showed better 
                         results. Then, the same events were simulated using only the 
                         Simple Ice scheme in the 3 and/or 9 km grid spacing domains. The 
                         representation of precipitation in the 3 km grid spacing domain 
                         showed significant improvement when only explicit convection 
                         scheme was used in both 9 and 3 km grid spacing domains. In part 
                         II, simulations for a 1-month period (March 2009) were performed 
                         with an operational version of MM5 installed at the Institute of 
                         Air Space Control (ICEA, Brazil). Two nested domains with grid 
                         spacing of 36 and 12 km, centered at Northeast Brazil, were used. 
                         In the 12 km grid spacing domain, the use of either hybrid 
                         approach (ICEA1) or only explicit scheme (Simple Ice; ICEA2) led 
                         to good representation of the precipitation interdaily 
                         variability, even though the total monthly precipitation was 
                         overestimated. ICEA2 (ICEA1) generated concentrated (broader) 
                         areas with high (lower) precipitation intensity. Despite the 
                         sensitivity of the simulated precipitation to the strategy used, 
                         the errors found in relation to the observations precluded the 
                         possibility of choosing the best strategy. As noted in previous 
                         studies, the doubts on the relationship between hybrid approach 
                         use adequacy and spatial resolution of the domains used in 
                         simulations with mesoscale models do persist, because the use of 
                         explicit schemes alone in higher resolution domains, in the 
                         present study, did not assure significant improvements in 
                         precipitation forecasts.",
            committee = "Sansigolo, Cl{\'o}vis Angeli (presidente) and Oyama, Marcos 
                         Daisuke (orientador) and Corr{\^e}a, Cleber Souza",
           copyholder = "SID/SCD",
         englishtitle = "Sensitivity of the simulated precipitation over the Alc{\^a}ntara 
                         Launch Center region to explicit convection schemes: case 
                         studies",
             language = "pt",
                pages = "154",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGP8W/37AUJDB",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP8W/37AUJDB",
           targetfile = "publicacao.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "08 maio 2024"
}


Fechar